Difference between revisions of "Immortals"
From House of Hozz
(Added category tree) |
m (added category tag) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===Immortals=== | ===Immortals=== | ||
<categorytree mode=pages showcount=on>Immortals</categorytree> | <categorytree mode=pages showcount=on>Immortals</categorytree> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Characters]] | ||
Revision as of 19:48, 23 February 2009
We're probably going to leave these guys pretty ambiguous. If we're going to involve many immortals in this story, each one is probably going to be treated as an individual.
Contents
Facts
Known
- none
Ideas
- In what way are they immortal? if they are at all.
- I like the idea of immortals that can't die, but can be killed. That is, if you can kill them. --Toad 06:10, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- do they originate strictly from Twinworld?
- We could go a lot of different ways with the source(s) of Immortals, but even for our own sake it's probably best that we don't. My gut says to leave the short answer at "who knows?" --Toad 06:10, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Immortals should have access to most/all magic, in power varying by what we want to do with them, but (probably?) always greater than mortal power. They might not always use it... but they should have it. Creation magic could be an exception.
Immortals
<categorytree mode=pages showcount=on>Immortals</categorytree>
