Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dragon lootz"
From House of Hozz
(Moved and added comments) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
After furthur consideration, this whole situation is a bit surreal. Or perhaps, more surreal than I had originally thought. Would it be better to try conveying the same idea, but with a slightly less crazy situation?[[User:Ziggy|Ziggy]] 21:41, 27 June 2008 (UTC) | After furthur consideration, this whole situation is a bit surreal. Or perhaps, more surreal than I had originally thought. Would it be better to try conveying the same idea, but with a slightly less crazy situation?[[User:Ziggy|Ziggy]] 21:41, 27 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Idea 1 is either dumb or worded horribly. I'm going to take it out. I like the feel of 2, but probably shouldn't go with actually destroying something valuable, seeing as Oswald does value property. [[User:Oswald|Oswald]] 00:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:21, 5 February 2009
We should have something Oswald looted show up later. I can totally imagine ziggy asking "where did you get this?" not realizing he was there.Ziggy
After furthur consideration, this whole situation is a bit surreal. Or perhaps, more surreal than I had originally thought. Would it be better to try conveying the same idea, but with a slightly less crazy situation?Ziggy 21:41, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Idea 1 is either dumb or worded horribly. I'm going to take it out. I like the feel of 2, but probably shouldn't go with actually destroying something valuable, seeing as Oswald does value property. Oswald 00:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
